Yes, Agree, Updates in hierarchy is very common use-case. And seeing path components in different hierarchy is not accepted by customers.
In some cases relating based on path components makes sense. Just out of interest, can it be ever done with Lucene, by some customization, or some attempts made for this. Thanks On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not automatically. There's no reason to assume that 'India' is the same in > 'India/Gujarat' and 'Asia/India'. Furthermore, if you first add a document > with India/Gujarat and later add a document Asia/India, we cannot go back > to the other document and update the hierarchy. > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Jigar Shah <jigaronl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is there some way to achieve this at Lucene level. so i can get facet > like > > below ? > > > > Doc1: Asia + Asia/India > > Doc2: India + Asia/India/Gujarat > > > > Which can result into this: > > > > Asia/India/Gujarat (2) > > > > Can Lucene internally index like above, as 'India' value already exist as > > path of some other document ? > > Or some other ways that can be explored within Lucene. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Lucene does not understand the word "India", therefore the facets that > > are > > > actually indexed are: > > > > > > Doc1: Asia + Asia/India > > > Doc2: India + India/Gujarat > > > > > > When you ask for top children, you will get Asia + India, both with a > > count > > > of 1. > > > > > > Shai > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jigar Shah <jigaronl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Very simple question, on facet > > > > > > > > Index has 2 documents as follows: > > > > > > > > Doc1 > > > > Indexed facet path: Asia/India > > > > Doc2 > > > > Indexed facet path: India/Gujarat > > > > > > > > > > > > Now while faceted search > > > > > > > > facets.getTopChildren() > > > > > > > > Will it return 1(Asia) result or 2(Asia, India) ? > > > > > > > > So basically will it join values and return hierarchy ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > >
