It depends on the number of fields. If you search on 3 fields it is not likely 
to be a problem (the general use case 3 fields: plain, stemmed, folded). But if 
you have like 50 fields, the slow down is likely very large!

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: aurelien.mazo...@francelabs.com
> [mailto:aurelien.mazo...@francelabs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 5:05 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Performance impact of searching across multiple fields
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am wondering about the real performance impact of searching across
> multiple fields instead of using a catch-all field. I know that Lucene is
> optimized to do that and that there are mechanisms to mitigate the
> overhead but does anybody know if  there are performance benchmarks
> related to this question?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aurélien
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to