Hi Erick Thanks a lot for the clarification.
Regards, K umaran R On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would be pretty skeptical of this approach You're > mixing numeric data with textual data and I expect > the results to be unpredictable. You already said > "it is working for most of the > documents except one or two documents." I predict > you'll find more and more of these as time passes. > > Expect many more anomalies. At best you need to > index both forms as text rather than mixing numeric > and text data. Since you're not sorting you should be > OK with the caveat that searching for > "02" won't match an indexed value of "2" unless you > remove all leading zeros at both index and query > time. > > Best, > Erick > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian > <kums....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes Will, You are right. But i dont use "status" field for sorting. i > have > > other fields that is being used for sorting specifically. And so i dont > > face any issues in sorting as of now. > > > > -- > > Kumaran R > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:20 PM, will <wmartin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Kumaran - > >> > >> Aren't you creating an unworkable scenario for sorting? > >> > >> -will > >> > >> On 10/27/15 5:49 AM, Kumaran Ramasubramanian wrote: > >> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> i have indexed module wise data in same index. In this case, we index > >>> two > >>> types of field in same name in two different document like this. > >>> > >>> *document1:* > >>> > >>> module:1 > >>>> status:4 ( as LongField ) > >>>> > >>>> *code:* > >>> > >>> long longValue=Long.parseLong(value); > >>>> LongField field=new LongField(f > >>>> ield > >>>> Name,longValue, Field.Store.YES); > >>>> document.add(field); > >>>> > >>>> > >>> *document2:* > >>> > >>> module:2 > >>>> status:open ( as Field ) > >>>> > >>> *code:* > >>> > >>> > >>>> Field field = new Field( > >>>> f > >>>> > >>>> ield > >>>> Name, value, (Field.Store) stored, (Field.Index) indexType); > >>>> > >>> document.add(field); > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> There are around 50lakh documents in my index which has these kind of > >>> mixed > >>> type of fields > >>> > >>> when i query like status:4 or status:open, it is working for most of > the > >>> documents except one or two documents. > >>> > >>> Not able to reproduce the same in other indexes. So i want confirm > whether > >>> it is supported to have both Field & LongField with same field name in > >>> same > >>> index. And also Please suggest me any articles discussing this kind of > >>> problem. > >>> > >>> Thanks :-) > >>> > >>> Related links: > >>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/109530 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ** > >>> Kumaran R > >>> > >>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
