That's perfect -- I'm interested in the stored field case. Thanks!
----- On May 26, 2016, at 3:46 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It depends which Lucene API you are talking to. For the inverted index, the
> order should be irrelevant. For doc values, Lucene will return values in
> sorted order per document. Finally stored fields will return values in the
> same order as they have been added to the Document at index-time (we do not
> guarantee this across different field names, but for values that are
> associated with the same field name, I think this is fine to assume).
> Le mer. 25 mai 2016 à 22:00, Daniel Bigham <dani...@wolfram.com> a écrit :
> > I've recently become aware that Lucene allows duplicate field names,
> > which essentially allows multiple values to be associated with a field.
> > A follow-up question is whether the order of the values is maintained...
> > if I store the values "A", "B", and then "C" in a given field for a
> > document, and then I later get the values via:
> > IndexableField[] f = doc.getFields(fieldName);
> > for (int i = 0; i < f.length; ++i)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> > ... will the values come back in the same order I added them?
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
