Le mer. 1 juin 2016 à 05:32, Ting Yao <ting.echo....@gmail.com> a écrit :
> In my opinion, the field data (we call it uninverted index data) can be > stored on disk like <doc_id -- field data> in doc id order, when we need > most fields values at a time, is this way the more efficient when the field > datas are not very big? And if it is stored in DocValues, the times of > reading disk are more than stored in field data. > Do I understand it right? > Sorry but I do not understand the question. Are you suggesting a way to be more efficient with sparse doc values ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7253) or maybe to use columnar storage for stored fields as well?
