It would be much slower and scoring does not work as expected. Full text search engines flatten the data and are fast because of that. Every additional field structure should also be flattened. To improve search you also index various stuff redundant, so you use copy fields to achieve that.
Uwe Am 22. Dezember 2016 17:57:38 MEZ schrieb "Nicolás Lichtmaier" <[email protected]>: >Why not turning every term int the search into a BooleanQuery listing >all the diferent fields to be searched? Is there a problem with that? > >Nicolás.- > > >El 21/12/16 a las 13:38, Uwe Schindler escribió: >> Hi, >> >> This is the standard approach, there is no better way. This also >keeps "scoring" working as expected, as the whole contents are seen as >"one entity" during scoring. >> >> Uwe >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: [email protected] >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: suriya prakash [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1:31 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: All Fields Search >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have 500 fields in a document to index. >>> >>> I append all the values and index it as separate field to support >all >>> fields search. I will also have 500 separate fields for field level >search. >>> >>> >>> Is there any other better way for all fields search? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Suriya >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de
