Thanks Erick On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In a word, "no". You must re-index from scratch. Worse, now that you > have some segments thinking the fields are docValues and some not and > maybe some mixed, I know of no way to un-entangle them. > > I'd create a new collection and re-index it entirely, then use > collection aliasing to point the applications at the new collection. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:49 AM, aravinth thangasami > <aravinththangas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On process of moving to Lucene 5 from Lucene 4, we faced this following > > issue > > We have enabled doc values in Lucene 5.we previously don't used doc > values > > in Lucene 4 > > > > Using UninvertingReader, sorting works fine until the first merge > happens. > > On merge documents in the older version without doc values affect the > > sorting order. > > > > Is there any way to solve this issue without reindexing ??? > > > > What is your opinion on it ? > > > > I was thinking about these two ways.will these possible ? > > > > 1. Does Uninverting Reader can be made to store the formed doc values to > > disk ? > > 2. During merge, does IndexWriter can be made to write the doc values for > > documents without doc value ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > Aravinth > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >