Joe: I have no reason to believe you were taken off the user's list intentionally. Maybe your spam filter is over-zealous or something? Or perhaps you registered with some no-longer-valid mail address and could register again?
Erick On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Joe Ye <yuanzhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Mike! My colleague only forwarded Erick's Solr reply today as it > seems I didn't get any emails and may have been taken off the mailing list > for some reason? > > We're using Lucene core only (version 6.2.1 at the moment). So there's no > link between the docValue and its associated stored field? Is there > anything similar/equivalent to useDocValuesAsStored in Lucene core? We're > trying to use docValues to avoid a full update (delete + create new)... > Yet, we still need to retrieve the updated values. > > Regards, > Joe > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Updating the doc value will not update the stored field (what document.get >> returns). If you need to change stored fields you have to use the >> IW.updateDocuments API, where the old document is deleted and a new >> document is indexed, atomically (to refresh). >> >> But also see Erick's solr-specific response (to the list) a week ago. >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Joe Ye <yuanzhou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Could anyone help with my issue described below? If I'm not posting on the >>> right mailing list please direct me to the correct one. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Joe Ye <yuanzhou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I have a few NumericDocValuesField fields and also added separate >>> > StoredField fields to store the values so that I can access them in >>> query >>> > results. I used IndexWriter.updateNumericDocValue to update the value >>> of >>> > a DocValues field. Then I firstly called SearcherManager.maybeRefresh to >>> > ensure SearcherManager.acquire will return refreshed instances and used >>> DocValuesNumbersQuery >>> > with the updated value. I did get the matching document in the query >>> > result but when I tried to access its value using Document.get, it's >>> still >>> > the old value. It appears that updating the DocValues field doesn't >>> update >>> > its associated StoredField value. What do I miss here? >>> > >>> > >>> > I would highly appreciate your help! >>> > >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Joe >>> > >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
