On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:26 PM Shifflett, David [USA] <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for running those tests.
> I haven’t looked into the test, but can you confirm it uses an analyzer
> with the lowercase filter?
>
Look at his diff. It's a diff on test not a test
- checkMatches("\"john smith\"", "1"); // Simple multi-term still works
- checkMatches("\"j* smyth~\"", "1,2"); // wildcards and fuzzies are
OK in
+ checkMatches("\"John Smith\"", "1"); // Simple multi-term still works
+ checkMatches("\"J* Smyth~\"", "1,2"); // wildcards and fuzzies are
OK in
Here I flip to Capital letters, and it still matches what it matches before
in lower.
> Also can you confirm whether the actual query being used contains upper or
> lower case J and S (in you John Smith case)
>
> Apologizes on the 'content:foo'.
> I changed the code snippet to "somefield", and missed changing that part
> of the output
>
> David Shifflett
>
>
> On 10/22/19, 5:51 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I wonder how it come up with this particular field :
> content:foo
> Anyway I added some uppercase in the test and it passed despite of it
>
> diff --git
>
> a/lucene/queryparser/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
> b/lucene/queryparser/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
> index 5935da9..9baa492 100644
> ---
>
> a/lucene/queryparser/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
> +++
>
> b/lucene/queryparser/src/test/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@
> boolean inOrder = true;
>
> public void testComplexPhrases() throws Exception {
> - checkMatches("\"john smith\"", "1"); // Simple multi-term still
> works
> - checkMatches("\"j* smyth~\"", "1,2"); // wildcards and fuzzies
> are
> OK in
> + checkMatches("\"John Smith\"", "1"); // Simple multi-term still
> works
> + checkMatches("\"J* Smyth~\"", "1,2"); // wildcards and fuzzies
> are
> OK in
> // phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john) smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic
> works
> checkMatches("\"jo* smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic
> works.
> @@ -161,11 +161,11 @@
> checkMatches("name:\"j* smyth~\"", "1,2");
> checkMatches("role:\"developer\"", "1,2");
> checkMatches("role:\"p* manager\"", "4");
> - checkMatches("role:de*", "1,2,3");
> + checkMatches("role:De*", "1,2,3");
> checkMatches("name:\"j* smyth~\"~5", "1,2,3");
> checkMatches("role:\"p* manager\" AND name:jack*", "4");
> checkMatches("+role:developer +name:jack*", "");
> - checkMatches("name:\"john smith\"~2 AND role:designer AND id:3",
> "3");
> + checkMatches("name:\"john smith\"~2 AND role:Designer AND id:3",
> "3");
> }
>
> public void testToStringContainsSlop() throws Exception {
>
> Problem seems a way odd (assuming CPQP does analysis), it seems like
> debugging is the last resort in this particular case.
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:31 PM Shifflett, David [USA] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Using the code snippet:
> > ComplexPhraseQueryParser qp = new
> > ComplexPhraseQueryParser(“somefield”, new StandardAnalyzer());
> > String teststr = "\"Foo Bar\"~2";
> > Query queryToSearch = qp.parse(teststr);
> > System.out.println("Query : " + queryToSearch.toString());
> > System.out.println("Type of query : " +
> > queryToSearch.getClass().getSimpleName());
> >
> > I am getting the output
> > Query : "Foo Bar"~2
> > Type of query : ComplexPhraseQuery
> >
> > If I change teststr to "\"Foo Bar\""
> > I get
> > Query : "Foo Bar"
> > Type of query : ComplexPhraseQuery
> >
> > If I change teststr to "Foo Bar"
> > I get
> > Query : content:foo content:bar
> > Type of query : BooleanQuery
> >
> >
> > In the first two cases I was expecting the search terms to be
> switched to
> > lowercase.
> >
> > Were the Foo and Bar left as originally specified because the terms
> are
> > inside double quotes?
> >
> > How can I specify a search term that I want treated as a Phrase,
> > but also have the query parser apply the LowerCaseFilter?
> >
> > I am hoping to avoid the need to handle this using PhraseQuery,
> > and continue to use the QueryParser.
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help you can give me,
> > David Shifflett
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
