The Jesuit mind is always justifying itself and trying to seem like there is popularity and hype around there ultimate disgraceful mislead.
Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 23, 2023, at 2:26 PM, Cody Amen <cody.a...@icloud.com> wrote: > > Hey man dont advertise or opinion. Lucene is just fine the way it is. Your > just idolating some Jesuit opinion to try and hurt people and disinformation. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 23, 2023, at 2:25 PM, Cody Amen <cody.a...@icloud.com> wrote: >> >> As oppossed to like i want to find everything less than < 6.00 >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:05 AM, Michael Wechner <michael.wech...@wyona.com> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Adrien >>> >>> Thank you very much for your feedback as well! >>> >>> I just replaced the StringField by KeywordField :-) >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Michael >>> >>>>> Am 20.10.23 um 14:13 schrieb Adrien Grand: >>>> FYI there is also KeywordField, which combines StringField and >>>> SortedSetDocValuesField. It supports filtering, sorting, faceting and >>>> retrieval. It's my go-to field for string values. >>>> >>>> Le ven. 20 oct. 2023, 12:20, Michael McCandless >>>> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> There are some differences. >>>> >>>> StringField is indexed into the inverted index (postings) so you >>>> can do >>>> efficient filtering. You can also store in stored fields to retrieve. >>>> >>>> FacetField does everything StringField does (filtering, storing >>>> (maybe?)), >>>> but in addition it stores data for faceting. I.e. you can compute >>>> facet >>>> counts or simple aggregations at search time. >>>> >>>> FacetField is also hierarchical: you can filter and facet by different >>>> points/levels of your hierarchy. >>>> >>>> Mike McCandless >>>> >>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 5:43 AM Michael Wechner >>>> <michael.wech...@wyona.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> I have found the following simple Facet Example >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/SimpleFacetsExample.java >>>>> >>>>> whereas for a simple categorization of documents I currently use >>>>> StringField, e.g. >>>>> >>>>> doc1.add(new StringField("category", "book")); >>>>> doc1.add(new StringField("category", "quantum_physics")); >>>>> doc1.add(new StringField("category", "Neumann")) >>>>> doc1.add(new StringField("category", "Wheeler")) >>>>> >>>>> doc2.add(new StringField("category", "magazine")); >>>>> doc2.add(new StringField("category", "astro_physics")); >>>>> >>>>> which works well, but would it be better to use Facets for this, >>>> e.g. >>>>> >>>>> doc1.add(new FacetField("media-type", "book")); >>>>> doc1.add(new FacetField("topic", "physics", "quantum"); >>>>> doc1.add(new FacetField("author", "Neumann"); >>>>> doc1.add(new FacetField("author", "Wheeler"); >>>>> >>>>> doc1.add(new FacetField("media-type", "magazine")); >>>>> doc1.add(new FacetField("topic", "physics", "astro"); >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> IIUC the StringField approach is more general, whereas the >>>> FacetField >>>>> approach allows to do a more specific categorization / search. >>>>> Or do I misunderstand this? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
