Windows XP, SP3 java -version 1.6.0_11-b03 nvidia 8400GS with 512mb of Vram
In earlier builds calling GraphicsDevice.getAvailableAcceleratedMemory() seemed to return a proper vram value. I've noticed that in more recent versions it is returning inaccurate values. On this particular machine calling it returns a value of 610 MB (639631360 bytes). On a newer vista 64 machine with an 512MB nvidia graphics card the call returns a large negative value. (about -1500MB). On a third winXP machine with a 128MB nvidia 5900 card it returns 176MB. The values are similar if I call the method right after creating the GraphicsDevice, after creating a buffer strategy, or after creating a seperate volatile image. Is this a known bug, or did something change? [Message sent by forum member 'donmc' (donmc)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=334127 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to lists...@java.sun.com and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to lists...@java.sun.com and include in the body of the message "help".
