You can check out some EAI work here:
http://www.web3d.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/other/unsupported/eai-vrml-java3d/
I don't see why adding one method to vrml.Browser over adding a
wrapper for each vrml.* is any uglier, btw. If you don't mind I'd
like to use it for the SAI.
Regards,
______________________________________
Rick Goldberg - Member Technical Staff
Sun Microsystems
Graphics Products - Computer Systems
901 San Antonio Road, MS UMPK27-302
Palo Alto, CA 94043-4900
650 786-0108 Direct
650 856-2114 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: VRML EAI
> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 21:04:45 -0600
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I've got a program which is based off the the Vrml97Player code. It needs
> to send events to a running sceneGraph based off user input. I've hacked a
> way to do it(add getNamedObjs to vrml.Browser and
> sun.com.j3d.loaders.vrml97.impl.Browser) but this seems really ugly.
>
> Know of any other way I can do this that might be more standard(ie not
> having to have custom x3d classes)
>
> Looking at Justin Couch's work with the EAI interface he proposed a
> Browser.getNode() interface which would do what I
> want(http://www.vrml.org/WorkingGroups/vrml-eai/Specification/part2/java
> Bind.html#B.5.2.11). Is it worth implementing these symantics and adding
> it to the package? I imagine that others are trying to do this same
> thing...
>
> -Alan Hudson
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
