Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > Michael P. McCutcheon wrote: > >> With Eclipse you have to re-write everything, and get less portability >> (does not run on OS X where Netbeans does). > > > Not that java3d module for netbeans will run on OS X :) > > Yes, you tell about possibilities that some applications exists. But > unless given person has an application which he REALLY wants to > integrate, there is no point in just waiting for it - there is same > chance that such app will appear as plugin for eclipse. I have used > netbeans for over 2 years and now I use eclipse for half a year. As much > as I hate SWT as an idea, I think that eclipse as an IDE is clearly > superior. Not because of gui, speed, memory usage (this is similar to > netbeans), but because of compile/refactoring/search/etc capabilities. > > Artur > > =========================================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body > of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". >
If IBM would just release SWT to the Java community problem, and there was some rational way of bringing SWT to Java, I wouldn't have such a problem with it. But IBM is not going to do that any time soon. Hence, I'm sticking with Netbeans. Mike =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
