Hi, What is the canonical way of documenting a record compact constructor?
Consider the following dummy record class: ========================================================= import java.util.Objects; /** * A class that represents a person's name. * * @param name the person's first name * @param surname the person's surname. */ public record Name(String name, String surname) { /** * Creates a new instance of {@code Name}. * * @throws NullPointerException if either {@code name} or * {@code surname} is null; */ Name { Objects.requiresNonNull(name); Objects.requiresNonNull(surname); } } ========================================================== We have noticed that in this case, javadoc will generate a warning, and the API documentation generated for the canonical constructor will not include the documentation of the `name` and `surname` parameters: Name.java:16: warning: no @param for name public Name { ^ Name.java:16: warning: no @param for surname public Name { ^ Shouldn't the @param be derived from the component description in the class level javadoc (at lines 6-7)? best regards, -- daniel