I like it except that I was expecting the module name (column) to
precede the package name (column).
Is there a strong reason to have the module name column appear second?
-- Jon
On 3/24/21 8:04 AM, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:37:13 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
Hannes Wallnöfer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional
commits since the last revision:
- JDK-8260388: Show module column in related packages table if packages are
in different modules
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8260388
- JDK-8260388: Listing (sub)packages at package level of API documentation
All OK; some suggestions for future work/cleanup/improvement
I have added a change to this PR to add a "Module" column to the related
packages table if any of the packages is in a different module. Example output for the
JDK libraries is available here (`java.lang`, `java.util` and `com.sun.tools.*` packages
have a module column):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8260388/api.03/
Implementation note: I added a HtmlStyle.colExtra CSS style because existing
column classes either had unwanted rules (such as displaying links in bold
font) or didn't fit for other reasons.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2917
