On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:35:03 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > Is there any semantic difference between "not statically Serilizable" and > "not a Serilizable type"? Also, there's a typo: Seri-a-lizable. Same semantics. The first phase of this cleanup used "not statically Serilizable"; however, I thought "not a Serilizable type" is a more precise statement. I can make a pass over the PR and make the wording consistent in the new comments. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5728
