On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:05:03 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Interesting: We have property `doclet.Annotation_Types` (with underscore) 
>> defined in `standard.properties` and `doclet.AnnotationTypes` (without 
>> underscore) in `doclets.properties. Both properties have the same value. 
>> Smells like another cleanup task.
>
> There's old naming and new naming.  We still use old naming for older 
> releases, and use the new naming for recent releases. There's low-level code 
> to select the right form, depending on the version.
> 
> So yes, for now, the internal code is inconsistent for old/new terminology, 
> and will never be completely new-clean because of declarations like 
> `TypeElement`, but the important point is that the generated output should 
> always be consistent, at least per the policy for that release.

Separately, I have *long* wanted a general clean up on resource naming, 
replacing the pervasive boring ubiquitous less-than-helpful `doclet.` prefix 
with something more informative. I would like to see a prefix that indicates 
the resource file (e.g. `tool` | `toolkit` | `html` ) and the category/kind 
(such as `warning`, `error`, `help`, `content`)

Maybe this is something to do in the next release (19). The first steps are to 
decide on a naming policy and to write an internal utility that will modify 
source code and resource files.   Strongly related in such a utility would be 
the sort the contents of the resource files.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6061

Reply via email to