On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:54:02 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I don't mind either way; @jonathan-gibbons do you have a preference?
>
> TANSTAAFL
>
> I suggest to leave the code as-is.
True, my previous suggestion is largely trivial.
In addition, I suggest to run `replaceAll` to ensure the map elements of each
value of `namedMembers` is unmodifiable as well:
namedMembers.replaceAll((k, m) -> {
m.replaceAll((n, members) -> Collections.unmodifiableList(members));
return Collections.unmodifiableMap(m);
});
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13044
