On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 13:20:53 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review a medium size update that is the last in the series of recent 
>> updates to refactor and simplify  builders and writers.
>> 
>> Having cleared away some of the earlier obfuscation, it becomes clear that 
>> all subtypes of `HtmlDocletWriter` generate pages for the overall 
>> documentation, and so a new abstract method `buildPage` is introduced to 
>> make that more obvious. This resulted in renaming some existing `build` 
>> methods and/or removing some static `generate` methods, though some of the 
>> more complex ones still remain.
>> 
>> In addition, all writers are now generally created by the `WriterFactory` 
>> class, providing an extension point should it ever be needed to subtype 
>> these classes. The methods on `WriterFactory` return the appropriate 
>> supertype (`HtmlDocletWriter` or `AbstractMemberWriter`) thus enforcing the 
>> use of the standard abstract methods that are now available.
>> 
>> There is also some cleanup to some of the member writers, including 
>> introducing more abstract methods to define common behavior, simplifying 
>> some method signatures, removing unused code, and providing documentation 
>> comments.
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/SummaryListWriter.java
>  line 50:
> 
>> 48:  * such as deprecated elements, preview elements, and so on.
>> 49:  *
>> 50:  * @param <B> a builder, to build the specific summary information to be 
>> written
> 
> Rewrite the sentence for clarity.

Propose the following:

/**
 * Base class for generating a summary page that lists elements with a common 
characteristic,
 * such as deprecated elements, preview elements, and so on.
 * 
 * Note: the use of "Summary" in this context is distinct from the use of 
"summary" in the
 * context of {@link AbstractMemberWriter#buildSummary(Content)}.
 *
 * @param <B> a builder, to determine the elements to be included in the summary
 */
 ```

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15114#discussion_r1282402406

Reply via email to