On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:41:37 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/formats/html/HtmlIds.java >> line 562: >> >>> 560: && e.getKind() != ElementKind.METHOD) >>> 561: throw new >>> IllegalArgumentException(String.valueOf(e.getKind())); >>> 562: var vmt = configuration.getVisibleMemberTable((TypeElement) >>> e.getEnclosingElement()); >> >> Will the vmt differ if we specify `-private`? And say if we have 2 methods >> like: >> >> private <T extends Runnable> void method(T arg) {} >> public <T extends Number> void method(T arg) {} >> >> Will the Number public method be consistently erased whether or not >> `-private` is set? > > The answer to your latter question is no. The id that will be assigned to > that public method do depend on whether the private overload positioned > before it is documented. You cannot do much about it with the current design > of `VisibleMemberTable` without unduly complicating this PR. On the bright > side, I reckon such a case is extremely rare. That's actually a sign of relief that the same elements will have the same id with the same input source code ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18519#discussion_r1551738452