Although, as you say, they're both geared towards artists and designers and live on the Java platform, JavaFX and Processing are pretty different as far as I can tell (having spent significantly more time in Processing than in JavaFX). Processing allows you to easily create and process media data, whereas JavaFX allows you to design within the language, something that's difficult or impossible in Processing.
While I have wanted (ever since JavaFX came out) to use JavaFX front-ends with Processing programs, I think that the two technologies are fundamentally different in their direction, which is why we have both. What kinds of changes do you think could be made to Processing to make it fit the same niche that JvaFX currently occupies (or vice versa)? - DAemon 2009/1/28 <manf...@mosabuam.com>: > > I had a bit of a gotcha moment related to the similarities between > Processing and JavaFX and thought I blog about it and ask you all here if > you have any answers. > > http://www.mosabuam.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=281 > > I think there is great potential to learn from each other at least and to > cooperate as well. > > Anybody with more involvement in either comment want to enlighten me? > > thanks > > Manfred > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
