James Strachan stated in a follow-up post that " I think a few folks got the wrong end of the stick thinking my post was some kinda put down of dynamically typed languages. I still like Groovy/Ruby/ JavaScript etc. I tried to focus the blog post purely on folks who were hacking statically typed code in javac.."
Whether or not Dick continues to say "I love the Groovy" shouldn't be based on whether James Strachan saws scala is a better replacement for javac than I dyn-lang. I'm a Groovy advocate and agree with that. The JVM is big enough for us all. On Jul 11, 9:40 pm, Weiqi Gao <weiqi...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... James Strachan has spoken in favor of Scala. > > -- > Weiqi Gao > weiqi...@gmail.comhttp://www.weiqigao.com/blog/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
