kirk wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand your point but I've never found it > advantageous to make a decision such as this on speculation. And unless > the JRuby guys know something we all don't, they are making a move on > speculation. > > Of course I don't know what they know or not; what I see is that they exchanged a situation in which their future was subject to an unknown commitment (Oracle's about JRuby) with another in which the commitment is sure (Engine Yard's about JRuby). Rather than speculation, I call that "removing uncertainty".
-- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it - mobile: +39 348.150.6941 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
