Thanks ! That's indeed the kind of accessible explanations I am looking for.
What would be the logical choice for a care-free open source project ? Everybody can use it, modify it, bla bla bla and the usage is your sole responsability. On Aug 26, 1:55 pm, Mike Jones <mike.a.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jan > > OSS Watch provides guidance albeit it is geared to helping the UK > academic community: > > http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/ > > http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/ipr.xml > > Hope that helps. > > Cheers > Mike > > 2009/8/26 Jan Goyvaerts <java.arti...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Putting a project on Kenai requires the choice of an open source license > > scheme. In Netbeans you'll get a combobox with the names. And if I'm not > > mistaken it can show you the licence terms at http://opensource.org/. > > I guess, if I were a jurist of some sorts these terms would be without > > question. Alas, I'm not. And I could certainly appreciate some kind of > > layman's explanation to the various schemes, differences, for which > > application types, etc... > > Does somebody know where I might look for these ? > > Thanks ! > > Jan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
