-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/7/10 19:18 , Marcelo Fukushima wrote: > and filled in 2002 > thats a lol moment for ya > Ditto. It seems that the lawyers don't fully understand the difference between "algorithm" and "implementation".
In any case, in my previous post I was talking about what I would consider reasonable and what not in a world where the patent system of laws was different than the current one, and I would not be against the patent of an algorithm where there's a high degree of innovation. - -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuT+WYACgkQeDweFqgUGxeHPQCfZyC4FyBTVLqfqyd24MYtENDw F2wAn1fsI/FTWbc+SqDvYaMMQZQU/Oc9 =zSTe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
