The lawsuit is about patents, not about trademark or copyright(*). Whether GWT quacks like java and/or looks like it is completely irrelevant. Does it break any of the patents? The list of 7 are publically available. While its somewhat hard to fathom for most of those what they even have to do with android, absolutely none of them are even remotely related to what GWT does.
On Aug 16, 3:08 pm, mP <miroslav.poko...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not a troll, but truth be told GWT is java for the browser with > some restrictions because of browser limitations. If it smells like a > duck, talks like a duck has classes named "java" all over its source > how could it not be java. If its not java the platform then why does > it have "java" plastered all over it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
