I thought OpenJDK was safe - the terms state that pretty clearly.
On Aug 19, 5:55 pm, "Vince O'Sullivan" <vjosulli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 18, 4:02 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> > wrote: > > > In the end, all the fears around are about the OpenJDK not being safe > > enough from patents, because it's GPLv2 and allegedly it only provides > > partial protection from patents. > > I'm not sure I follow the argument here. Are you saying that if > OpenJDK (or, by implication, any other software) is released under the > appropriate licence then it becomes immune from patent claims? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
