Simply put.  What does your sneaky throws give me that I do not already have
if I am only using RuntimeExceptions?  I can currently add those to my
hearts content on my method signatures.  I can already catch them where they
don't appear to originate from. Warnings would be nice, I'll give.  I'll
even grant that the suppression syntax can look exactly like
"SneakyThrows."

My point is still simply that you get there pretty much all the way, by
simply using non-checked exceptions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to