Don't worry think first about Quantum Dynamics before getting into these over philosophical dialogs about an equals method
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Ricky Clarkson <ricky.clark...@gmail.com>wrote: > No real shame on Java though; equality is broken to varying degrees in > most programming languages. > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gabriel Claramunt > <gabriel.claram...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Coincidentally, I was reading the same Effective Java chapter and it > > dawned to me that the generalization of the solution was to use type > > classes and that inheritance is really, really problematic... I have > > to admit that maybe the FP zealots were right ... > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
