I wonder if the answer is to use more British terminology and call
them "App Shops".

On Jan 12, 4:01 pm, Ryan Waterer <aguitadel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting --
>
> Apple applied for this Trademark back in 2008 (7/17/2008).
>
> The US Patent office opened up opposition remarks on 1-05-2010.  Why is
> MicroSoft just now remarking on this?
>
> In looking at the history of the 
> trademarkhttp://tarr.uspto.gov/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77%2F525433&action=Req...
>
> I'm not a lawyer, nor familiar with the Trademark process, but it appears
> that it was refused, which then was appealed by apple.
>
> Other interesting dates in my opinion:
> 2009-03-19 - Final Refusal Written
> 2009-09-22 - Amendment From Applicant Entered
> 2009-11-21 - Use Amendment Filed
> 2009-12-01 - Amendment to Use approved
>
> --Ryan
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Alexey Zinger <inline_f...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > What you're describing is a trademark then, not a patent.  If it's a
> > patent, then it's about the very concept of an app store, which is yet
> > another modern IP/software/business model patent absurdity.
>
> > Alexey
> > 2001 Honda CBR600F4i (CCS)
> > 1996 Honda RS125 (CCS)
> > 2002 Suzuki Bandit 1200S
> >http://azinger.blogspot.com
> >http://bsheet.sourceforge.net
> >http://wcollage.sourceforge.net
>
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Moandji Ezana <mwa...@gmail.com>
> > *To:* javaposse@googlegroups.com
> > *Sent:* Wed, January 12, 2011 10:23:06 AM
> > *Subject:* Re: [The Java Posse] Apple patents App Stores
>
> > You mean they trademarked "App Store". In my limited understanding, that
> > means others can make app stores, but can't call them that, whereas
> > "patenting App Stores" would mean others couldn't make app stores. I may be
> > wrong.
>
> > Moandji
>
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Vince O'Sullivan 
> > <vjosulli...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Microsoft opposes move.
>
> >>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12173224
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "The Java Posse" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups
> >>  .com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups 
> > .com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups 
> > .com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to