Works well mobile as well since all you have to change is the CSS sheet. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:38 PM, clay <claytonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd still argue that the time of these traditional server-side web > frameworks has passed. Static HTML+JavaScript applications (with > client-side frameworks like YUI or ExtJS) and server side REST/JSON > services (with Jersey or something similar) are the best way to go. > > Using 100% pure client HTML/CSS/JS rather than web framework template > files (.jsp, .gsp, etc) works way better with tools like DreamWeaver > and gives designers maximum independence from server-side programming. > Especially given the criteria you list, this is easily a better fit. > > On Feb 17, 8:38 am, Lenny P <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> wrote: > > So here is a quick summary of what I found out in my lengthy research: > > It went down to 5 candidates, JSF, GWT, RIFE, Tapestry & Grails. > > I had a couple of must-have criteria: > > - A web designer has to be able to read/write the app via DreamWeaver > > or other non-programmer tool > > - UI has to be built in a definition language, not a programming > > language, i.e. no parent.addXXX(child) > > - Easy to use, and integrates with the current web projects in use. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Robert Casto www.robertcasto.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
