Gosh - Sorry Jan, I have absolutely no recollection of saying that, can someone give me a hint what my train of thought might have been.
I don't use JPA in Scala, as much as I liked it in Java. I use Squeryl, sometimes Querulous, and MongoDB whenever I can. I think traits can be a more natural way of mixing in persistence to a class than annotations (perhaps that's what I was thinking), but beyond that I can't imagine what I would have been thinking at the time :-). Dick On Jun 15, 2:37 am, Jan Goyvaerts <java.arti...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the aforementioned episode Dick talks about Scala being natural/intuitive > for object persistence. I assumed he meant using JPA with case classes. But > did he meant it that way ? In the last week I had various trials with mixed > success. I'd rather have case classes for their advantages but then there's > the tricky formatting of the annotations. > > Does anybody in here have a working example/doc of these Scala-natural > entities ? (case classes ? all in one file ? etc ...) > > My biggest frustration : I can't get the 2nd level caching working. I've > done this many times in Java. But Scala code resisted all my attempts so > far. Does anybody in here managed to enable the 2nd level cache ? Please ... > :-P > > Thanks ! > > Jan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
