Sorry to insist but I feel pretty strongly about this kind of accusation. On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > A Perl enthusiast who's written three blog posts in two years says he > >> > doesn't like a new language and we should pay attention because...? > >> > Anyway, even if I focus on the message and not the messenger, I can't > >> > say I > >> > see a lot of value in this post, why did you find it noticeable? > >> > >> Don't know why, but I found how you managed to turn an admission of an > >> ad hom into an insult rather amusing. :) > > > > Er... wha? > > Rereading what I wrote, I see fact, fact, a question and a personal > opinion. > > Where do you see any attack?!? > > I guess it is that I did not see the transition from an ad hom tone in > the first part where you were belittling perl and the blogger Where do I belittle Perl?!? Where do I make fun of the blogger? You're seeing things. > , to no > tone where you asked why the person found this interesting. You even > called out how you were making a direct ad hom attack Again, there was no hominem attack, unless you think that "A tennis expert just made a comment on a football game" is an insult toward the tennis expert. Seriously. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
