> > It'd be a punch in the face if the program also included some sort of > statement about that with a single java client, there's no need to do > separate versions for each OS like Google does... :) >
I think, if there really were advantages to doing it in Java, Google would've gone that route already. This smells of JNI and platform specific code paths, even more so than Picasa, Google Earth etc. I'm afraid the Duke is no longer capable of providing any interesting punches and I'd go as far as to claim, Google Drive would upset its average users if it required Java. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/WRcORdn-lrsJ. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
