On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:26:48 +0200, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk>
wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:01 -0700, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
[...]
blame a company for moving away from Java ME. The faster we leave this
monstrosity behind, the better.
If Java ME was/is a monstrosity what does that make JavaCard?
Monstrosity is not a correct word, while I do understand that Java ME is
no more a strategic asset. I'd understand whether Google stopped any
development on a JME application, but I can't understand why it has to be
completely removed, as the previous poster said that in some way others
are being able to manage it. Especially in this crisis scenario, you can't
force *all* the people to buy a new phone because they can't read the mail
any longer.
In any case, I find excessive to say that Google is fighting a crusade
against Java.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
