On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:21:08 +0200, Kevin Wright
<kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com> wrote:
In one word: Immutability
In two words: yes and no. Immutability must be pursued as often as
possible, but a general purpose language cannot force it. Lots of
developer around aren't skilled enough to work with immutable-only data.
PS I'm not sure immutability would solve the problem above, but I didn't
think a lot about it.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
