On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 10:36:49 AM UTC+2, fabrizio.giudici wrote: > >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 05:21:06 +0200, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Definitely. Java is mostly backward compatible and I feel Java 8 will be >> the first exception. >> > > This doesn't make much sense to me, but perhaps I'm missing something. To > wit:
So, I had to go back and make sure I didn't actually say that. This being essentially the point I was alluding to in my snippet. Much more thoroughly (and clearly) made, though. :) I haven't followed up afterwards to clear up what I meant, though, since it looked like that point was touched by others before I saw my direct responses. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
