I was happy with using a trivial /etc/init.d service wrapper that just 
calls "java -jar <myapp>.jar" on startup and does a process kill for 
shutdown.

It seems silly to use a more heavy-weight tool that actually requires a 
license purchase.

There are tons of conversations on this exact topic of Java service 
wrappers on stackexhange

On Monday, February 10, 2014 4:34:42 AM UTC-6, rakesh mailgroups wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin, 
>
> I think the idea of an embedded container inside the stack a la Play 
> is what Spring boot is trying to emulate. Its irrelevant whether it is 
> jetty or tomcat. 
>
> What I need is an easy way to do : java -jar <myapp>.jar 
>
> Cheers 
>
> Rakesh 
>
> On 10 February 2014 10:13, Kevin Wright <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > The best advice is probably to "use Jetty" 
> > 
> > It seems to have much better support for running as an embedded 
> container, 
> > I've never seen a solution with Tomcat that didn't look cumbersome. 
> > 
> > You might also investigate if you *truly* need a container.  I'm 
> guessing 
> > that your dependency on Spring demands one, but an increasing number of 
> > frameworks and libraries (such as play) are happily doing away with 
> > containers altogether.  This is certainly the trend in the Scala 
> ecosystem, 
> > but I'd be awfully surprised if the trickle down effect didn't mean that 
> > similar ideas weren't also being adopted by someone somewhere in pure 
> Java. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 10 February 2014 10:05, Rakesh <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Hi guys, 
> >> 
> >> decided to do something different and deploy my app with an embedded 
> >> Tomcat instance. 
> >> 
> >> The new Spring Boot project actively encourages this and it is very 
> >> nice from a purely dev perspective not having to configure a container 
> >> externally to test things. 
> >> 
> >> However, I deploy to Unix (AWS has their own variant) and am stumped 
> >> with getting the app to automatically start. 
> >> 
> >> Googling around has uncovered some very complicated solutions, 
> >> including an apache project to achieve this. 
> >> 
> >> Any advice? Does it have to be so hard? 
> >> 
> >> Thanks 
> >> 
> >> Rakesh 
> >> 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "Java Posse" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>. 
>
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to