In my example, ¿str not it's mutable? On 11 ago, 20:11, Anand <[email protected]> wrote: > String is immutable . So whatever data stored in String var remain for > temporary whereas > StringBuffer stores data permanently. so Stringbuffer is better > > 2009/8/11 Márcio Souza <[email protected]> > > > > > With String => You'll create 3 Strings. > > With StringBuilder => You'll create 1 String. > > > vlw! > > You > > > 2009/8/11 [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > I always thought String was a final class, while StringBuffer wasn't. > > >> Cheers, > > >> -m > > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:37 AM, hefaeche <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> What it's the difference? Which it's better? > > >>> String str = new String( "Hola" ); > >>> str = str.concat(" Mundo" ); > >>> System.out.println( str ); > > >>> vs > > >>> StringBuffered str=new StringBuffered("Hola") > >>> str.append( " Mundo" ); > >>> System.out.println( str ); > > >>> (jdk 1.6) > > >> -- > >> I've never met anyone who liked George W. Bush. > > >> -Some guy from Denmark I met in Iceland > > -- > AnAnD > JAVA / J2EE Developer, > .
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaprogrammingwithpassion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
