Dan Streetman wrote: > For a bit of background, that was added
[...] Interesting, thanks. I hadn't considered that the kernel scheduler interval would have an effect - I guess that's why not every javax.usb user would see a problem. > Modified patch (using only 10000) is applied in CVS, thanks. And performance is improved just as much as with 100ms. With a 10ms sleep my test now sees LinuxRequestProxy#isRequestWaiting() invoked only 0.6% times as much as with the 0ms sleep. Thanks for your work on javax.usb. -- Mark Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ javax-usb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
