Hey Christian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Nentwich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Here are the benchmarks I was talking about, pasted from another e-mail. > It's against Xalan 1, because Xalan 2 threw up on some of the paths for > some reason. > > Pretty shocking results :)
Agreed! :-) Just out of interest, what did the tests look like? e.g. Were you using Xalan's XPath API or using XSLT directly? Which model were you using with Jaxen? James > > ----- > > Ok, first number is JAXEN in milliseconds, second number is Xalan. > Results are for queries executed 100 times, except the last two, which > were executed less often. The test document was 6 MB in size. > > Straight path: 743 / 1437 > Path with node() selector: 1080 / 2138 > Path with predicate: 1509 / 3089 > normalize-space: 1126 / 2484 > Path with // (descendant axis): 17467 / 206945 > Path with ancestor:: : 8015 / 103715 > > ----- > > Christian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jaxen-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Jaxen-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest
