At 2:18 PM +0000 3/22/02, Christian Nentwich wrote: >> >er.... >> > >> >System.Xml.XmlDocument >> >System.Xml.XmlNode >> Where are those coming from? They're unfamiliar to me. They don't >> seem to be a part of either Java or Jaxen. > >They are the classes from the .NET XML processing namespace :) >
Then that's more proof we shouldn't be using this naming convention. :-) Actually I'm only half-joking. C#/.Net's naming conventions are perversely backwards from Java's. For example, all the classes have an initial lower case letter and all the fields and methods have an initial upper case letter. Honestly, nothing annoys me more about C# than that. Gary Cornell told me that C# is actually copying Delphi conventions, and that Java is perversely backwards from the earlier Delphi. Be that as it may, I don't think Microsoft .Net conventions should be any way suggestive for Java. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Jaxen-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest
