On 23 Mar 2002, David Peterson wrote:
> Item 1: Class Names
> ===================
>
> Proposal 1: Preserved Case
> --------------------------
+0. I'm moderately for this, and will vote with who-ever else votes
this way.
+1, also to org.jaxen.dom4j.Dom4jXPath as opposed to
org.jaxen.dom4j.XPath.
> Item 2: A Generic XPath implementation
> ======================================
>
> Question: Should a Generic XPath be implemented?
Conditional vote:
0. I abstain. I personally won't use it and will probably
never find the time to implement it m'self. But, then again,
I'm *not* the only committer anymore.
-1 if this implies that *all* uses of Jaxen run through
the reflection calls and static compile-time binding isn't
available. Veto veto veto.
-bob
_______________________________________________
Jaxen-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest
