Daniel Barclay wrote: > Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >> Daniel, I totally agree with your points. However, do you think it >> would require more time to create a patch than writing this mail? :-) > > > Definitely. (Not everyone is already set up for editing and checking in > JaxMeXS code, and familiar with generating patches and not getting them > backwards.) > > Besides, if I just patched those instances of the errors, that wouldn't > do anything to help the authors recognize all the other instances or > to prevent the creation of additional instances in the future. (That's > why I tried to explain the problem and the fix clearly.)
You explain the authors the most with patches. Besides, note that I won't find the time to integrate your suggestions. I would find the time, though, to review and integrate patches, because that's a lot faster. Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
