Perfect, let's see then if Jochen or any other Jaxme developers (although I also think he's a bit alone) want to make this contribution. Otherwise I would be happy to work on it!
As far as I know, my company was thinking in Sun JAXB RI as the replacement implementation, so I don't think they are aware that it suffers the same problem (I wasn't aware too). Maybe it's possible to split the costs, but we will have to wait until monday to know it. Anyway, I don't think it's worth to discuss the details now until we know if Jochen is interested. Meanwhile I will be taking a look at the code to be able to estimate the effort more accurately. Even if I'm not chosen, I will try to do my bit! :) Best regards, José Luis. 2007/7/27, Robert Eric Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Cool. We'll wait to see if anybody responds, if you wish. > > > > How much time would you need to complete this refactoring project? > > > > As far as your company goes, keep in mind that the Sun JAXB implementation > (both 1 and 2) has the same problem. Do you know of any other > implementation? > > > > If not, then maybe your company and my company can split the cost. You > could work on it at work, and we would subsidize some of the cost for your > company. Then we both benefit! > > > > Thanks! > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > *From:* Jose Luis Huertas Fernández [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Friday, July 27, 2007 11:39 AM > *To:* jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Refactor startElement and get paid > > > > Hello Robert, > > we are facing the same problems here. These days we are thinking if it's > worth for us to fix this "bug" or it's better changing to another JAXB > implementation. > > I think our company is not willing to invest our time refactoring Jaxme > and probably they will move to another implementation. Anyway I was thinking > to make this changes by myself at home and this could be a good incentive. > > But, to be fair and honest, people who has contributed directly to the > Jaxme development deserve this opportunity much more than me. Just in case > that no Jaxme developers wanted to make these modifications contact me if > you are still interested. > > Best regards, > > Jose Luis Huertas. > > 2007/7/27, Robert Eric Reeves < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > All, > > > > There is an upper limit to the number of sub-elements a complexType can > have using JaxMe. Using the attached XSD, test.xsd, you will notice that > JaxMe generates a startElement method in TesttypeHandler.java that is > larger than the java compiler can handle. > > > > Phurnace Software is willing to pay you to refactor JaxMe so that the > startElement is significantly smaller. Of course, we would hope this code > would be committed to the JaxMe mainline development so that all can > benefit. I think an upper bound of 250 elements should suffice, but more > would be welcome. > > > > This is a chance to get paid to work on JaxMe. Please let me know if you > are interested. Compensation details can be worked out privately. I can > assure that this project will be well worth your time. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Robert > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
