Sounds good to me new_trader :-) However, nonlinear, I am curious: In the other thread on "Questions and Suggestions", you mentioned that JBT has in fact got support for indicators: does this not require OHLC to be implemented already then? Or is this indicator functionality based on trades on a tick-by-tick basis only?
Best, gvanto On Feb 9, 10:19 pm, new_trader <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > thanks a lot for your input! > > Perhaps it could be a good idea if Eugene is giving us some > architectural proposals and guidance how an OHLC integration would be > best implemented. This would be important as Eugene knows the > architecture of the system best. > Gvanto and me could then perhaps do the implementation work. Eugene > could then do some kind of quality assurance. > > Best regards, > > new_trader > > On Feb 9, 9:49 am, gvanto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hehe heck no, I'm not imagining it's easy at all only easier than the > > first ... > > Like I always say, nothing that's easy is worth the effort. > > > Then again, if JBT already has indicator-functionality built-in, I > > take it must be calculating OHLCs ? > > (for which a trade-feed, not just market depth is required, right?) > > > Anywayz, great idea with JBT ! > > > On Feb 7, 12:30 am, nonlinear5 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Am I right in thinking that extending JBT to include OHLC data might > > > > be easier? > > > > Yes, it's probably easier, but not as easy as you seem to think. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JBookTrader" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
