All/Rickard...
I haven't heard of JUnit. Will surf over there and
check it out.
Rickard: as far as testing status goes, I've got your
framework up and running. Last night I started work
on some of the stateful bean testing.
I'll download and look into JUnit today...
BTW, great job on the new binary releases and the
installers looks great, whoever accomplished this!
cheers,
peter
--- Justin Forder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rickard
> �berg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >To answer myself
> >
> >Rickard �berg wrote:
> >> For all those interested in jBoss testing: would
> it be a good idea to
> >> use the JUnit framework
> (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?JavaUnit)? Does anyone
> >> have experience with this software?
> >
> >Ok, I tried this out myself, and it seems to fit
> our requirements pretty
> >well. Peter (test head), what do you think of
> JUnit? Would it be ok to
> >use it you think? If so, then go ahead and start
> implementing tests
> >according to the JUnit format. If there are no loud
> objections I will
> >also convert the tests I already have to use JUnit.
>
> I think it's great, and it's what I suggested people
> should use for
> developing JAWS tests. There was some debate about
> how to package tests,
> and (if I remember right) Aaron has set up a
> test.jboss directory to
> parallel the org.jboss hierarchy. This is for unit
> tests of internal
> code - I think it's agreed that functional tests
> (executing clients
> against beans deployed in jBoss) should be in
> TestBean.jar in ZOL.
>
> Have you found the latest version of JUnit (3.2,
> AFAIK)?
>
> It's at http://www.xprogramming.com/software.htm
>
> regards
>
> Justin
>
> --
> Justin Forder
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
