Adi,
I understand what you are saying here and you are
correct, however... I'm am not talking about an
administrative feature.  What I'm referring to is a
lifecycle/resource management scheme implemented
inside the container.

Administrative control is another issue, important..
but different.

cheers,
peter


--- Adi Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, This is a missing feature.
> 
> There should be passivate and activate (or pause
> resume) for the container
> (the server)
> You can now only do it by shuting down the server.
> 
> This is an Admin request type and not a statndard
> user client. In
> implenation our Servers
> we use pause resume which is similar in concept.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Peter Braswell
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:       Thursday, June 29, 2000 6:16 AM
> > To: jBoss Developer
> > Subject:    RE: [jBoss-Dev] EJB
> passivation/activation
> > 
> > Marc,
> > Not really concerned about passivating a
> particular
> > bean, I just want to set up a situation that will
> > passivate ANY bean as opposed to a PARTICULAR
> bean.
> > 
> > I would imagine most containers use a LRU
> approach, I
> > just want to force passivation/activation and
> verify
> > the callbacks from the container.  Each bean will
> keep
> > a rolling history of its own
> activation/passivation
> > which will become part of its state.  The client
> can
> > then extract this history and verify that all the
> > correct callbacks are being invoked by the
> container
> > on the bean in the correct order.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > peter
> > 
> > 
> > --- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf
> > > Of Peter Braswell
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 2:43 PM
> > > > To: jBoss Developer
> > > > Subject: [jBoss-Dev] EJB
> passivation/activation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > > Whats the best way to force these to occur
> give
> > > the
> > > > current construct of jboss?
> > > >
> > > > I suspect its to monkey around with the jboss
> xml
> > > file
> > > > to specify minimum and maximum instances and
> in
> > > the
> > > > client create a number of connections greater
> than
> > > the
> > > > minimum specified in the xml.  Am I on the
> right
> > > > track?
> > > >
> > > > Essentially I want a scheme to force
> activation
> > > and
> > > > passivation.... :-)
> > > 
> > > The plugin we have with AC is the random
> passivation
> > > one.  I am not sure it
> > > is controllable.
> > > 
> > > marc
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > the JCTS guy (aka Peter)
> > > >
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access
> from
> > > anywhere!
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from
> anywhere!
> > http://mail.yahoo.com/
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to