Ok it is done for the entity stuff,
sorry it took me time juha I had a hard concentrating.
Please review the changes it is pretty trivial and I will put it in the find
methods as well :)
marc
PS: the test seems to run fine with the factorization
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:56 PM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] setEJBObject
>
>
> ok then the method is createEntity and as I said pretty much
> everything that
> is related to the container EJB stuff is being moved to EntityContainer.
>
> what's your take, I should be able to commit in a couple of
> minutes, but it
> might be getting late for you, I will let you know, juha, tell me what you
> think
>
> marc
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juha Lindfors
> > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 1:28 PM
> > To: jBoss Developer
> > Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] setEJBObject
> >
> >
> >
> > well I'm reading that part of the code too, does that count? :)
> >
> > -- Juha
> >
> > At 15:22 7.7.2000 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Doesn't XP require pair programming anymore?
> > >
> > >- jeremiah
> > >
> > >------Original Message------
> > >From: Juha Lindfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: July 7, 2000 8:12:14 PM GMT
> > >Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] setEJBObject
> > >
> > >
> > >At 12:07 7.7.2000 -0700, you wrote:
> > >>> At 11:57 7.7.2000 -0700, you wrote:
> > >>> >THIS IS NORMAL XP PRACTICE.
> > >>>
> > >>> hmmmmmmm.....
> > >>
> > >>WHAT!?
> > >>
> > >>LOL
> > >
> > >nothing ;)
> > >
> > >-- Juha
> > >
> > >______________________________________________
> > >FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> > >Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
