Thanks for the clarification. I probably should have put a little context
around my question so that it didn't seem too cheeky.
I'm trying to inject some XP into my own situation where I have one team
in Vietnam and another in the US. We're not going to be able to implement
the textbook methodology but even a variant (like yours but different)
will be a lot better than what we have now.
Thanks for the insight.
Todd
On 11-11:59, marc fleury wrote:
> > > > New TM is done.
> > > >
> > > > hee hee an XP session of 6 hours :)
> > >
> > > who's your XP partner Marc?
> > >
> >
> > Rickard,
> >
> > marc
>
> On the subject of XP and pair programming.
>
> Pair programming is a discipline of XP. XP is larger.
>
> We do a "variant" of Pair Programming. Rickard designs and code the first
> version, I come in and I can focus on the details for the framework.
>
> We do the same with most our projects. Jaws, the metadata (sebastien and
> me), the caches (rickard, simone) the pools (aaron rickard), zola, zoap (to
> come), and you will notice that most pGO projects are done in pair.
>
> XP is the natural practice for Open Source development. Design/code/design
> tuning/re-factoring.
>
> A little theory, evolutionnary design, mucho coding, is imho the right
> formalism for the Open Source development and definitly the one that seems
> to work for jboss
>
> marc
>
>
